Dariba VAT Engine
Live demo — anonymised sample data, January 2026 period. Every finding below is real engine output. Sign up to run it on your own data →
D

Significant Risk

Score: 48.5/100 · 9findings across 5 modules  · Demo period: January 2026

VAT Exposure

SAR 12,300

VAT Opportunity

SAR 0

Audit Risk Score

40/100

Est. Penalty

SAR 615

up to SAR 12,300

Module Scores

Sales
91.5/1002 findings
Purchases
58/1004 findings
Reconciliation
100/1000 findings
Forensic
99/1002 findings
ZATCA
100/1001 finding

Top Findings

5
P-021 line(s) claiming SAR 6,000.00 input VAT with no supplier TRNSAR 6,000

Input VAT of SAR 6,000.00 is claimed on 1 line(s) that record no supplier TRN. A deduction stands only on a valid tax invoice, and a valid tax invoice must show the supplier's TRN (Art. 53(5)(c)). Without it the claim is unsupported; if the supplier was never registered, the "VAT" paid was not VAT at all and is irrecoverable.

VAT Implementing Regulations, Art. 49(7), Art. 53(5)(c); GCC VAT Agreement, Art. 481 row
5
P-03SAR 2,250.00 input VAT recovered on: Entertainment, sporting or cultural servicesSAR 2,250

1 line(s) matching "Entertainment, sporting or cultural services" carry recovered input VAT of SAR 2,250.00. Art. 50 deems this expenditure incurred outside the economic activity — the deduction is blocked even where a genuine business purpose exists, unless the goods or services are acquired for direct onward taxable supply. Blocked-VAT recovery is among the first items ZATCA examiners test because it is mechanical to assess.

VAT Implementing Regulations, Art. 501 row
5
P-03SAR 2,250.00 input VAT recovered on: Catering in hotels, restaurants and similar venuesSAR 2,250

1 line(s) matching "Catering in hotels, restaurants and similar venues" carry recovered input VAT of SAR 2,250.00. Art. 50 deems this expenditure incurred outside the economic activity — the deduction is blocked even where a genuine business purpose exists, unless the goods or services are acquired for direct onward taxable supply. Blocked-VAT recovery is among the first items ZATCA examiners test because it is mechanical to assess.

VAT Implementing Regulations, Art. 501 row
5
P-06Invoice claimed 2 times — SAR 1,800.00 over-recoveredSAR 1,800

The same invoice (matching supplier, invoice number, and all 1 line amount(s)) appears 2 times in the register. One claim is valid; the remaining 1 are duplicates over-recovering SAR 1,800.00 of input VAT. Duplicate posting most often enters through both an invoice scan and a payment-request workflow.

VAT Implementing Regulations, Art. 49 — one deduction per supply2 rows
5
S-022 missing invoice number(s) in series "INV-"

The series "INV-" runs from 1 to 28 but 2 number(s) are absent: 5, 6. Missing numbers in a sequential series are the single strongest indicator of suppressed or unreported sales. Cancelled invoices are a legitimate explanation — but each cancellation must be evidenced.

VAT Implementing Regulations, Art. 53(5)(b) — sequential invoice numbering1 row
4
Z-02Indicative penalty exposure of SAR 615.00–SAR 12,300.00SAR 12,300

The exposures identified across the review total SAR 12,300.00 of VAT at risk. Applying ZATCA's penalty framework indicatively: the low end represents one month's late-payment fine (Art. 43 — 5% of unpaid VAT); the high end represents the evasion band (a penalty up to the value of the unpaid VAT itself). This gives a potential penalty range of SAR 615.00 to SAR 12,300.00, on top of the VAT principal. Actual penalties depend on ZATCA's assessment, the specific provisions engaged, and any prevailing amnesty; a voluntary disclosure before examination materially reduces this.

KSA VAT Law, Arts. 39–45 (penalties) — indicative, subject to ZATCA discretion

Ready to run it on your own data?

Upload your actual sales and purchase registers. One free review included — no card required.

Start free trial →